This course introduces students to natural language processing and exposes them to the variety of methods available for reasoning about text in computational systems. NLP is deeply interdisciplinary, drawing on both linguistics and computer science, and helps drive much contemporary work in text analysis (as used in computational social science, the digital humanities, and computational journalism). We will focus on major algorithms used in NLP for various applications (part-of-speech tagging, parsing, coreference resolution, machine translation) and on the linguistic phenomena those algorithms attempt to model. Students will implement algorithms and create linguistically annotated data on which those algorithms depend.


  • [SLP3] Dan Jurafsky and James Martin, Speech and Language Processing (3nd ed. draft) [Available here]
  • [SLP2] Dan Jurafsky and James Martin, Speech and Language Processing (2nd ed., 2009)
  • [G] Yoav Goldberg, Neural Network Methods for Natural Language Processing (2017) [Available for free on campus/VPN here]
  • [PS] James Pustejovsky and Amber Stubbs, Natural Language Annotation for Machine Learning (2012) [Available for free on campus/VPN here]


(Subject to change.)

Week Date Topic Readings
18/24Introduction [slides]SLP2 ch 1
28/29Text classification 1 [slides]SLP3 ch 6
8/31Text classification 2; logreg [slides]SLP3 ch 7; G 4
39/5Text classification 3; neural nets [slides]G 13
9/7Construction of truth; ethics [slides]PS ch. 6; Hovy and Spruit 2016
49/12Language modeling 1 [slides]SLP3 ch 4
9/14Language modeling 2; RNN [slides]G 14
59/19Vector semantics and word embeddings [slides]SLP3 ch 15, 16
9/21Sequence labeling problems: POS tagging [slides]SLP3 ch 10
69/26HMM, MEMM; Viterbi [slides]SLP3 ch 9
9/28CRF, LSTM [slides]Wallach 2004
710/3Features and hypothesis testing [slides]Berg-Kirkpatrick et al. 2012; Søgaard et al. 2014
10/5Context-free syntax [slides]SLP3 ch 11
810/10Context-free parsing algorithms [slides]SLP3 ch 12, 13
10/12Review [slides]
10/19Dependency syntax [slides]SLP3 ch 14
1010/24Dependency parsing algorithms [slides]SLP3 ch 14
10/26Compositional semantics [Jacob Andreas] [slides]SLP2 chs 17, 18
1110/31Semantic parsing [slides]SLP3 11.6 (CCG), Zettlemoyer and Collins 2005
11/2Semantic role labeling [slides]SLP3 ch 22
1211/7Wordnet, supersenses and WSD [slides]SLP3 ch 17
11/9Discourse and pragmatics [slides]SLP2 ch 21
1311/14Coreference resolution [slides]SLP2 ch 21
11/16Social NLP [slides]Pick one: Voigt et al. 2017; Cheng et al. 2017; Underwood 2016
1411/21Machine translation; seq2seq [John DeNero] [slides]SLP2 ch 25; G 17
11/23No class (Thanksgiving)
1511/28Conversational agents [slides]SLP3 ch 29
11/30Future and review [slides]
RRR12/5Final project presentations (202 South Hall)


Info 159

50% Homeworks and short in-class quizzes (approximately 8 of each)
20% Midterm exam
30% Final exam

Info 259

50% Homeworks and short in-class quizzes (approximately 8 of each)
20% Midterm exam
30% Project:
      5% Proposal/literature review
      5% Midterm report
      15% Final report
      5% Presentation

For H homeworks and Q quizzes, the homework/quiz grade will be calculated as the highest (H+Q)-3 scores (i.e., the lowest 3 scores out of the H+Q total number will be dropped).


Info 259 will be capped by a semester-long project (involving 1 or 2 students), involving natural language processing -- either focusing on core NLP methods or using NLP in support of an empirical research question. The project will be comprised of four components:

  • — Project proposal and literature review. Students will propose the research question to be examined, motivate its rationale as an interesting question worth asking, and assess its potential to contribute new knowledge by situating it within related literature in the scientific community. (2 pages; 5 sources)
  • — Midterm report. By the middle of the course, students should present initial experimental results and establish a validation strategy to be performed at the end of experimentation. (4 pages; 10 sources)
  • — Final report. The final report will include a complete description of work undertaken for the project, including data collection, development of methods, experimental details (complete enough for replication), comparison with past work, and a thorough analysis. Projects will be evaluated according to standards for conference publication—including clarity, originality, soundness, substance, evaluation, meaningful comparison, and impact (of ideas, software, and/or datasets). (8 pages)
  • — Presentation. At the end of the semester, teams will present their work in a poster session.
All reports should use the ACL 2017 style files for either LaTeX or Microsoft Word.


Academic Integrity

All students will follow the UC Berkeley code of conduct. While the group project is a collaborative effort, all homeworks must be completed independently. All writing must be your own; if you mention the work of others, you must be clear in citing the appropriate source (For additional information on plagiarism, see here.) This holds for source code as well: if you use others' code (e.g., from StackOverflow), you must cite its source. Late homeworks will not be accepted.

Students with Disabilities

Our goal is to make class a learning environment accessible to all students. If you need disability-related accommodations and have a Letter of Accommodation from the DSP, have emergency medical information you wish to share with me, or need special arrangements in case the building must be evacuated, please inform me immediately. I'm happy to discuss privately after class or at my office.

Late assignments

No late assignments will be accepted. (Though note the grading calculation allows for the lowest 3 homework and quiz scores to not count.)