New Photographic Technology and the Social Uses of
Images
Nancy Van
House
Professor
http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/~vanhouse
December 21, 2004
Printable versions of this paper: with images and without.
| People
use new technology according to what it means for them and how it fits
their higher-order goals and on-going activities. To understand how people
do and will use new technology, and how to design it to be usable and
attractive, then, requires understanding the purposes for which new technology
is likely to be used.
Virtually everyone is in some way affected by personal
photography—as photographer, subject, or viewer. Photos are of great
sentimental value: often the one thing that people rush to save when
their house burns is their pictures. Our contention is that networked
imaging devices (now represented by cameraphones) are becoming ubiquitous,
and that the ease with which images can now be captured digitally and
shared via the internet are fundamentally changing photographic practices
– but in ways continuous with past practice. |
||
Understanding The Uses of Existing and Emerging Photo Technology |
||
| |
|
|
| We
use the term “photoblog” as a catch-all term for the array of internet-based
genres for photo display and sharing. Traditional personal photo collections
consist of framed photo displays, photo albums, and, most of all, disorganized
boxes of envelopes of prints and negatives, most of which are rarely viewed
by the owner, even more rarely by friends and family, and never by strangers.
Internet-based sites now make images easily viewable (and downloadable)
by others. While some sites are aimed at (and may be limited to) friends
and family, many are viewable by the world at large, giving any photographer
a public forum for their photos.
|
||
The MMM2 project (with which this project is associated) is developing a prototype context-aware cameraphone application for mobile media sharing, and an associated web-based photo sharing application. This project it about using social science findings,
methods, and perspectives to understand personal photography in ways
that will inform design. We are investigating the purposes for which
people have used personal photos. In addition, we are investigating
cutting-edge uses as harbingers of how people will use image capturing
and sharing technology for new purposes. |
||
|
Collecting Data: Interviewing and Examining
Images |
||
| Our
approach consists of interviewing photographers and examining images and
collections. We are interviewing casual photographers, both digital and
film, asking what people take pictures of, what they do with the images,
and, most important, why. In addition, through the MMM2 project we have
given cameraphones and service to about 60 SIIMS students and faculty,
a technology-savvy group with social and professional ties. This project
is, in essence, a small experiment demonstrating how people may use digital
images when they have a camera always-at-hand, with minimal barriers to
personal use and sharing of photos. Finally, we are examining internet-based
sites of many kinds on which people post photos. |
||
Some Key Findings |
||
| • We have identified four high-order traditional uses of photos: constructing personal and group memory; creating and maintaining relationships; self-expression; and self-presentation. From our study of cameraphone users, we identified a fifth category: functional images. People are using cameraphones like copy machines, to capture images for later use (e.g., a whiteboard at a meeting). From our data, we conlude that self-expression and self-presentation are rapidly growing: making pictures easy to take, view, and share, and having an audience and (for cameraphone users) a camera always at hand encourage experimentation with more expressive uses of images. | ![]() |
|
| •
The printed photo remains highly important for many uses. The affordances
of the physical artifact enable, for example, gift-giving and display
in ways that digital images do not satisfy. In addition, many people are
concerned about the persistence of digital images, a problem not shared
by printed images.
|
|
| • The face-to-face encounter, or at least the real-time, synchronous sharing of images, remains important to many of the uses of photos. This interaction allows the photographer to control the interpretation of the image, to tailor the story to the audience, and to re-live the experience portrayed. | ||
• In addition, however, the cameraphones and the internet, separately and together, are encouraging innovative, exciting uses of images. Examining these innovations helps us to see the new interpretations of photos that are emerging. In particular, the use of images for communication – both functional communication and creating and maintaining relationships -- is growing. People use images to communicate with friends and colleagues (e.g., someone reminded his work group that their time was running out by sending everyone a picture of a clock). And they use them to communicate with strangers (the site sorryeverybody.com consists of images of Americans apologizing to the world for the 2004 election, and images of foreigners accepting their apologies). Challenge sites like Digital Street Gamesallow participants to compete, demonstrate their accomplishments, and rate one another’s activities – all remotely |
![]() |
|
|
Plans |
||
Our plans are to extend our interviews of casual photographers and cameraphone uses. We have only begun examining internet-based photo sites. In addition we will begin interviewing photobloggers. As MMM2 develops, we will have added quantitative data to add to our qualitative data on capture and sharing of images. Our approach is rooted in science and technology studies (which emphasizes understanding the meaning of the technology to the users, and users’ higher-order goals) and grounded theory (where the choice of subjects is governed by the categories of uses and users that emerge in the course of the interviews and the examination of photoblogs). The primary outcomes of this study will be a framework for understanding users’ higher-order intentions currently and potentially served by personal photographic images and by sharing technology; and a comprehensive assessment of the specific kinds of uses being made of images with emerging technology. In addition, the theoretical framework of this study (not described here) will be useful for other design efforts based on integrating understanding users needs, preferences, and goals with technological capabilities. |
||
|
|
||